Twitter Thread: Fascinatingly Wrong and Fake Facts About the Moon Landing

Author image for Eric Lund
Eric Lund
Apr 10, 2021 12:00 PM EDT

Maybe it's a commentary on how easy it is to believe confidently presented pseudoscientific conspiracy theories. Maybe it's just fun to say really stupid things. Either way, David Hughes presents a set of dumb non-facts about the moon landing. It's like this tumblr thread on the Titanic that's as fascinating as it is made up.

Add as a preferred
source on Google
Advertisement
  • 01
    Font - David Hughes @david8hughes Let's talk about the moon landings. There's no way they happened and in this thread l'm going to explain why. 5:52 PM · Feb 8, 2019 · Twitter for iPhone
    via david8hughes
  • 02
    Font - David Hughes @david8hughes · Feb 8, 2019 ... Replying to @david8hughes Firstly, the moon is only available at night and it takes three days to get to the moon so the astropilots would have had to time it so they got to the moon at night, otherwise they'd just land on the sun and die. 36 27 457 4.7K David Hughes O @david8hughes · Feb 8, 2019 Then there's the Vin Diesel radiation belts which NASA have said cannot be penetrated. 18 27 86 1.9K
    via david8hughes
  • 03
    Font - David Hughes O @david8hughes · Feb 8, 2019 ... At last count, astrologers say there are between 10,000 and 400 billion stars between here and the moon, not to mention the big satellite used to give us telly, so any spaceship would collide with all that stuff if it tried going to the moon. 20 27 68 1.8K David Hughes @david8hughes · Feb 8, 2019 Now let's look at the moon footage. There are two men walking on the surface of the moon, despite NASA saying that three men went there. I don't kno
    via david8hughes
  • 04
    Organism - David Hughes O @david8hughes · Feb 8, 2019 Furtherhencemorth, the astroboys are on the moon at night time and yet somehow there's a light source casting shadows. They're walking on the only night time space light so how can that have shadows on it? 35 27 145 2K David Hughes O @david8hughes · Feb 8, 2019 We're supposed to believe they planted a flag on the surface when we know for a fact that the lack of gravity in space would have melted the pole. O 12 t7 88 1.7K
    via david8hughes
  • 05
    Font - David Hughes O In this 1996 interview with the New York Times, Armstrong claims that the expedition was for codes. Codes which didn't exist until nearly a year after the alleged moon landings. @david8hughes · Feb 8, 2019 ... "We only went up there to get cheat codes for Mario Kart. Not for me, I didn't need them. I'm the best at the computer. But I did it for Buzz because he sucks dk at Mario Kart."
    via david8hughes
  • 06
    Azure - David Hughes O @david8hughes · Feb 8, 2019 Wake up. It's all lies by big moon just to get us to buy more moon. 51 t7 254 2.8K
    via david8hughes
  • 07
    Font - David Hughes @david8hughes Jul 11, 2020 ... This is making the rounds again and people messaging me are very mad that I'm stupid. Being mad at someone for being stupid isn't helpful. Also you are the ones who are stupid and it's making me really fen angry. 9 27 3 141
    via david8hughes

Want More? Follow Us and Add Us as a Preferred Source on Google.

Tags

moon hoax lol dumb science moon landing funny stupid
Scroll Down For The Next Article